<- Back to TES Publication List


Contact Ming Luo (Ming.Luo@jpl.nasa.gov) for details.

Simulated observation of tropospheric ozone and CO with the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) satellite instrument

M. Luo and R. Beer

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

D. J. Jacob and J. A. Logan

Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

C. D. Rodgers

Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, England

Abstract.

The Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) on board NASA's Aura satellite (to be launched mid-2003) will provide measurements of global distributions of ozone, CO, and other key chemical species in the troposphere. In order for TES to meet a design lifetime of five years it has been determined that a global survey strategy with approximately a 50% duty cycle must be identified. In this study, simulated concentrations of ozone and CO from the GEOS-CHEM global three-dimensional model of troposphere chemistry are used as a time-varying synthetic atmosphere for demonstrating and assessing the capabilities of TES nadir observations. Auto-correlation analyses of the model species fields for different time lags identify a significant 1-day correlation and support a 1-day-on, 1-day-off observation strategy. Three major steps are then taken to demonstrate and evaluate TES products: (1) species profiles along the TES orbit track are sampled from the model 3-D, time-varying fields with cloudy scenes (50-60% of total scenes) removed; (2) nadir retrieved profiles ("Level 2 products") are obtained from these "true" synthetic profiles using TES retrieval characteristic functions; (3) interpolated daily global maps ("Level 3 products") are generated to compare with the original model fields. The latter comparison indicates that the error in the Level 3 products relative to the true fields for ozone and CO is less than 10% in about 70% of cases, and less than 20% in 80-90% of cases. The three major sources of error lie in the asynoptic orbital sampling, the retrieval, and the Level 3 global mapping.